Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #14012

closed

NameError is raised when use class variables in Refinements

Added by joker1007 (Tomohiro Hashidate) over 6 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.

Status:
Rejected
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
ruby -v:
ruby 2.4.2p198 (2017-09-14 revision 59899) [x86_64-linux]
[ruby-core:83263]
Tags:

Description

Sorry in advance if other ticket exists.

In a case, Reference to class variables raises unnatural NameError.

A class variable is defined in a module.
And include the module in "refine" block.
Refined method cannot use the class variable, and raises NameError.

Sample.

module FooMod
  @@foo_mod1 = 1

  def foo_mod1
    p self.class.class_variable_get("@@foo_mod1")
  end
end

module FooMod2
  @@foo_mod2 = 1

  def foo_mod2
    p self.class.class_variable_get("@@foo_mod2")
  end
end

class Foo
  @@hoge = 1

  include FooMod

  def hoge1
    p @@hoge
  end
end

module Ext
  refine Foo do
    def hoge2
      p self.class.class_variable_get("@@hoge")
    end

    include FooMod2
  end
end

using Ext

Foo.new.hoge1 # => 1 OK
Foo.new.hoge2 # => 1 OK

Foo.new.foo_mod1 # => 1 OK
Foo.new.foo_mod2 # => uninitialized class variable @@foo_mod2 in Foo (NameError)

Is This behavior Refinements spec? or bug?


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to Ruby master - Feature #12533: Refinements: allow modules inclusion, in which the module can call internal methods which it defines. Closedmatz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)Actions

Updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler) over 6 years ago

I have no idea if this is a bug or a feature, but I believe it seems more
of a bug. The @@variables should be accessible within the namespace of
the specific class right? So it should be viewable in a refinement too -
but admittedly, I have no idea about the specification of refinements
and I also have not been using @@variables in ages either. I just think
that this is more likely to be a bug.

Actions #2

Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) over 6 years ago

  • Related to Feature #12533: Refinements: allow modules inclusion, in which the module can call internal methods which it defines. added

Updated by shugo (Shugo Maeda) over 3 years ago

I'm not against the change, if there is no implementation difficulty.
However, class variables are not accessible in class_eval either, and reflection APIs can be used as a workaround as you suggested, so the change may not be necessary.

Updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Open to Rejected

I officially reject this proposal. Class variables are no longer encouraged to use.

Matz.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0