Extra allocation in String#byteslice
String#byteslice with a range, I noticed that sometimes the original string is allocated again. When I run the following script:
require "objspace" string = "a" * 100_000 GC.start GC.disable generation = GC.count ObjectSpace.trace_object_allocations do string.byteslice(50_000..-1) ObjectSpace.each_object(String) do |string| p string.bytesize if ObjectSpace.allocation_generation(string) == generation end end
50000 100000 6 5
The one with 50000 bytes is the result of
String#byteslice, but the one with 100000 bytes is the duplicated original string. I expected only the result of
String#byteslice to be amongst new allocations.
If instead of the last 50000 bytes I slice the first 50000 bytes, the extra duplication doesn't occur.
# ... string.byteslice(0, 50_000) # ...
It's definitely ok if the implementation of
String#bytesize allocates extra strings as part of the implementation, but it would be nice if they were deallocated before returning the result.
EDIT: It seems that
String#slice has the same issue.
#3 [ruby-core:87867] Updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 4 months ago
Okay, I reproduced the error. I made a test case here:
I test both prefix and postfix as you discuss in your initial report.
#6 [ruby-core:87872] Updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 4 months ago
I think there are several things to consider here:
- Even though the string appears to be two allocations, it's only one allocation but the 2nd one is sharing the first's data.
- I guess that subsequent slice would share the underling frozen string?
- In some cases, byteslice might be less efficient, e.g. 100Mbyte buffer, slice the last 10bytes, it makes an entire copy of the source string, but all you were interested in was 10 bytes at the end.
#7 [ruby-core:87877] Updated by funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov) 4 months ago
ioquatix (Samuel Williams), your patch doesn't seems to be correct for me on first glance.
Imagine pipelined RPC server:
- we read data into buffer
- while buffer larger than request size
- detect first request and split buffer into request and rest of buffer
Same for any other binary parser.
With current behavior, operation "get rest of buffer" will copy buffer into shared frozen string only once.
With your patch it will copy every time.
So instead on linear complexity we will have quadratic complexity.
Thinking second time, it is possible to use frozen string explicitely for buffer, just not so trivial (while there are not enough data for request, buffer should not frozen, and
<< should be used, otherwise it should be frozen, and
Some programs will certainly become slower with this change, until they fixed.
I'm not against the patch, but new behavior should be carefully documented and mentioned in a Changelog as a change, that could negatively affect performance if not concerned.
#9 [ruby-core:87879] Updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 4 months ago
The way I've implemented it now (as in your first example) is something like this:
@buffer = read_data if @buffer.bytesize > REQUEST_SIZE @buffer.freeze request_buffer = @buffer.byteslice(0, REQUEST_SIZE) @buffer = @buffer.byteslice(REQUEST_SIZE, @buffer.bytesize) end
Because we will recreate @buffer from remainder, it makes sense to freeze the source to avoid generating a hidden copy. Does that make sense?
I believe if we were to propose an implementation of
byteslice! it would look like the above.
#10 [ruby-core:87880] Updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 4 months ago
I played around with my assumptions here. By far the worst from a memory POV was
slice!, which given a string of 5MB, produces 7.5MB allocations. The equivalent sequence of
byteslice as above only allocates 2.5MB.
Here were my comparisons:
measure_memory("Initial allocation") do string = "a" * 5*1024*1024 string.freeze end # => 5.0 MB measure_memory("Byteslice from start to middle") do # Why does this need to allocate memory? Surely it can share the original allocation? x = string.byteslice(0, string.bytesize / 2) end # => 2.5 MB measure_memory("Byteslice from middle to end") do string.byteslice(string.bytesize / 2, string.bytesize) end # => 0.0 MB measure_memory("Slice! from start to middle") do string.dup.slice!(0, string.bytesize / 2) # dup doesn't make any difference to size of allocations end # => 7.5 MB measure_memory("Byte slice into two halves") do head = string.byteslice(0, string.bytesize / 2) remainder = string.byteslice(string.bytesize / 2, string.bytesize) end # 2.5 MB
(examples are also here: https://github.com/socketry/async-io/blob/master/examples/allocations/byteslice.rb)
In the best case, the last example should be able to reuse the source string entirely, but Ruby doesn't seem capable of doing that yet. Perhaps a specific implementation of
byteslice! could address this use case with zero allocations?