Actions
Bug #16243
closedcase/when is slower than if on MRI
Status:
Closed
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
ruby -v:
ruby 2.6.5p114 (2019-10-01 revision 67812) [x86_64-linux]
Backport:
Description
This comes from a discussion on a PR on Sidekiq: https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq/pull/4303
This benchmark:
# frozen_string_literal: true
require "benchmark/ips"
def deep_dup_case(obj)
case obj
when Integer, Float, TrueClass, FalseClass, NilClass
obj
when String
obj.dup
when Array
obj.map { |e| deep_dup_case(e) }
when Hash
duped = obj.dup
duped.each_pair do |key, value|
duped[key] = deep_dup_case(value)
end
else
obj.dup
end
end
def deep_dup_if(obj)
if Integer === obj || Float === obj || TrueClass === obj || FalseClass === obj || NilClass === obj
obj
elsif String === obj
obj.dup
elsif Array === obj
obj.map { |e| deep_dup_if(e) }
elsif Hash === obj
duped = obj.dup
duped.each_pair do |key, value|
duped[key] = deep_dup_if(value)
end
duped
else
obj.dup
end
end
obj = { "class" => "FooWorker", "args" => [1, 2, 3, "foobar"], "jid" => "123987123" }
Benchmark.ips do |x|
x.report("deep_dup_case") do
deep_dup_case(obj)
end
x.report("deep_dup_if") do
deep_dup_if(obj)
end
x.compare!
end
gives in MRI 2.6.5:
Warming up --------------------------------------
deep_dup_case 37.767k i/100ms
deep_dup_if 41.802k i/100ms
Calculating -------------------------------------
deep_dup_case 408.046k (± 0.9%) i/s - 2.077M in 5.090997s
deep_dup_if 456.657k (± 0.9%) i/s - 2.299M in 5.035040s
Comparison:
deep_dup_if: 456657.4 i/s
deep_dup_case: 408046.1 i/s - 1.12x slower
It seems @tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) already noticed this a while ago due to missing inline caches for case
, but the performance bug seems to still remain:
https://youtu.be/b77V0rkr5rk?t=1442
Do you think this could be fixed in MRI?
AFAIK both JRuby and TruffleRuby support inline cached ===
calls in case/when
.
I think the code with case
is more idiomatic and readable and should be preferred to if
, and this performance issue makes that less clear.
Files
Actions
Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0