Bug #16437: Codespell report for Ruby 2.6.5 (and 2.7.0-rc1)

• Status: Closed
• Assignee: -
• Target version: -
• ruby -v: ruby 2.6.5 (2.7.0-rc1)
• Backport: 2.5: UNKNOWN, 2.6: UNKNOWN

[jschleus (Jens Schleusener)]

The FOSS server fossies.org offers a new feature "Source code misspelling reports":

https://fossies.org/features.html#codespell

Although such reports are normally only generated on request, as Fossies administrator I have just created (for testing purposes) an analysis for the current Ruby release 2.6.5:

https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell.html

That version-independent URL should redirect always to the last report (if available), so currently to

https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.6.5.tar.gz/codespell.html

Although after a first review some obviously wrong matches ("false positives") are already filtered out (ignored) please inform me if you find more of them so that I can force a new improved check if applicable.

Just for information there are also two supplemental pages

https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell_conf.html

showing some used "codespell" configurations and

https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby/codespell_fps.html

showing all resulting obvious "false positives".

Since a lot of spelling errors seem recently been fixed a similar check was done also for the new release candidate 2.7.0-rc1

https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.7.0-rc1.tar.gz/codespell.html

Jens

[mame (Yusuke Endoh)]

• Status changed from Open to Feedback

Is there anyone who is interested in this? I'd be happy if anyone could look through the result and create a patch. Contribution is welcome.

@jschleus Thanks. If possible, could you apply the checker to master? In the tarballs, there are auto-generated files and bundled third party's code, many of which are difficult to fix.

[nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)]

• Status changed from Feedback to Closed

Applied in changeset git|db166290088fb7d39d01f68b9860253893d4f1a7.

---

Fixed misspellings

Fixed misspellings reported at [Bug #16437], only in ruby and rubyspec.

[nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)]

Fixed for ruby core, standard libraries, default gems and rubyspec.
Could you report other upstreams (rubygems, bundler, minitest, rake, test-unit, and unicode.org)?

BTW, I'm unsure what word is appropriate to the variable for the “read” (past participle) number.

[hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)]

You can see a list of the upstream with https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/master/doc/maintainers.rdoc#default-gems-maintainers

[jschleus (Jens Schleusener)]

There was now also a check done for Ruby master but since the according tarball isn't embedded into the Fossies standard services a test folder was used:

https://fossies.org/linux/test/ruby-master.tar.gz/codespell.html
(https://fossies.org/linux/test/ruby-master-d76c8cf.191222.tar.gz/codespell.html)

Additionally a codespell check was done for the new release candidate 2.7.0-rc2

https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.7.0-rc2.tar.gz/codespell.html

Here the results for the currently used codespell configuration:

               spelling error
 Ruby       occurences  types                        
 2.6.5             583    369
 2.7.0-rc1         463    299                   
 2.7.0-rc2         362    243                           
 master d76c8cf    172    122

Although the numbers are not completely comparable it looks now much better!

Not really understood I have the remark
"Could you report other upstreams (rubygems, bundler, minitest, rake, test-unit, and unicode.org)"

If that is addressed to me, I found separate tarballs only for rubygems and rake. The other mentioned ones appear to be partially contained in the main ruby tarball? Sorry, I'm not very familiar with the complete Ruby system.

[nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)]

jschleus (Jens Schleusener) wrote:

There was now also a check done for Ruby master but since the according tarball isn't embedded into the Fossies standard services a test folder was used:

https://fossies.org/linux/test/ruby-master.tar.gz/codespell.html
(https://fossies.org/linux/test/ruby-master-d76c8cf.191222.tar.gz/codespell.html)

Additionally a codespell check was done for the new release candidate 2.7.0-rc2

https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.7.0-rc2.tar.gz/codespell.html

Here the results for the currently used codespell configuration:

               spelling error
 Ruby       occurences  types                        
 2.6.5             583    369
 2.7.0-rc1         463    299                   
 2.7.0-rc2         362    243                           
 master d76c8cf    172    122

Although the numbers are not completely comparable it looks now much better!

Some are not misspells (a part of path name or URL, a person's name, an abbreviation, an API name, a part of the interface, ...), and some are intentional typos for tests.

And we generate ChangeLog from the git commit log at packaging but we don't use force-push, so typos in that file cannot be modified.

Not really understood I have the remark
"Could you report other upstreams (rubygems, bundler, minitest, rake, test-unit, and unicode.org)"

If that is addressed to me, I found separate tarballs only for rubygems and rake. The other mentioned ones appear to be partially contained in the main ruby tarball? Sorry, I'm not very familiar with the complete Ruby system.

Some files under gems/, lib/, spec/, test/ are imported from external gems.

• rubygems
• bundler
• minitest
• rake
• test-unit

I had mistaken that the files under enc/trans/JIS/ are copied from Unicode.org, but they are come from Citrus Project which seems finished.

[jschleus (Jens Schleusener)]

Yes, your mentioned types of false positives are often found and I had tried to eliminate them before. Some nevertheless overseen ones are now also excluded. Additionally the mentioned sub-directories of external gems are now also excluded. Assuming the word "exapmle" is an intentional typo it looks now very well and the (unimportant) Fossies ranking for 2.7.0-rc2 and master is "A+". Congratulation!

[nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)]

Thank you, yes, "exapmle" in test/openssl/test_x509name.rb is intentional to test malformed RDN by a typo.
And for others:

• Fixed the typos in debug_counter.h and error.c.
• I see the word "unuseful" in some online dictionaries.
• spawnve is an old function name provided by Microsoft and some platforms.
• The URLs in "enc/x_emoji.h" come from NTT-DoCoMo.
  Although the pages for developers in English seem no longer provided, its Japanese version has the same word.
  Maybe %-escape can avoid the false positive.
• "lib/rubygems.rb" comes from the external library rubygems.
• PRES stands for "private resident", an abbreviation in FreeBSD.

[nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)]

And as I added fixing typos in ChangeLog file taking from git-notes, the file in the next package will be fixed.

[duerst (Martin Dürst)]

nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) wrote:

• I see the word "unuseful" in some online dictionaries.

Yes, but that doesn't mean it's best. As an example, "unuseful" shows up on Google about 363,000 times, but "useless" shows up on Google about 120,000,000 times. So replacing "unuseful" by "useless" is definitely an improvement; the sentence reads much more naturally that way.

[jschleus (Jens Schleusener)]

Just for completeness

https://fossies.org/linux/misc/ruby-2.7.0.tar.gz/codespell.html

Great!