Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #17885

closed

require_relative and require should be compatible with each other when symlinked files are used

Added by john_firebaugh (John Firebaugh) over 3 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
ruby -v:
ruby 2.6.6p146 (2020-03-31 revision 67876) [x86_64-darwin19]
[ruby-core:104010]

Description

This is similar to #10222 (which was fixed), but it's with symlinked files. #10222 was with symlinked directories.

If files are symlinked, then mixing require and require_relative can result in the same file being loaded twice.

mkdir a
echo "require_relative 'b'" > a/a.rb
echo "p 'b loaded'" > a/b.rb
mkdir b
ln -s ../a/a.rb b
ln -s ../a/b.rb b
echo "$: << File.expand_path('../b', __FILE__); require 'b'; require 'a'" > c.rb
ruby c.rb

Expected behavior is that this prints "b loaded" once. Actual behavior is that it prints "b loaded" twice.


Related issues 2 (0 open2 closed)

Related to Ruby master - Bug #18452: Dramatic performance regression in Zeitwerk with 3.1RejectedActions
Is duplicate of Ruby master - Bug #10222: require_relative and require should be compatible with each other when symlinks are usedClosedActions
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0