Actions
Misc #20628
closedDevMeeting-2024-08-01
Status:
Closed
Assignee:
-
Description
The next dev meeting¶
Date: 2024/08/01 13:00-17:00 (JST)
Log: https://github.com/ruby/dev-meeting-log/blob/master/2024/DevMeeting-2024-08-01.md
- Dev meeting IS NOT a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
- Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
- Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
- We will write a record of the discussion in the file or to each ticket in English.
- All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
- The date, time and place of the meeting are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.
- DO NOT discuss then on this ticket, please.
Call for agenda items¶
If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format:
* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
* Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.)
Example:
* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
* I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature.
- It is recommended to add a comment by 2024/07/29. We hold a preparatory meeting to create an agenda a few days before the dev-meeting.
- The format is strict. We'll use this script to automatically create an markdown-style agenda. We may ignore a comment that does not follow the format.
- Your comment is mandatory. We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time. We appreciate it if you could write a short summary and update from a previous discussion.
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 4 months ago
- Related to Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeeting added
Updated by byroot (Jean Boussier) 4 months ago
-
[Feature #20590] Ensure
fork
isn't called whenraddrinfo
's background thread is ingetaddrinfo
(byroot)- Full rationale in the ticket, too large to copy here.
- I understand that this solution is quite unorthodox, but I think it would solve a lot of problems for many people.
- I'm interested in feedback about the approach.
- It can introduce latency in
fork
, butfork
is rarely very time sensitive.
-
[Feature #20594] A new String method to append bytes while preserving encoding (byroot)
- The idea was accepted in the last meeting, but a better name was requested.
- I think two methods would be best.
String#append_bytes(String) => self
String#append_byte(Integer) => self
Updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev) 4 months ago
- [Feature #18368] Range#step semantics for non-Numeric ranges (zverok)
- The feature was approved a year ago by @matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) but the PR doesn’t receive any review/comments/answers. Not sure what I should do to move forward, so submitting it to the dev. meeting.
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) 4 months ago
- [Bug #20620] singleton_method undefined for module using "extend self" (jeremyevans0)
- I believe this is expected behavior and the bug can be rejected, is that correct?
- I think it is unfortunate that the
all
argument tosingleton_methods
defaults totrue
, but I don't think it's worth breaking backwards compatibility to change it.
- [Bug #20637] SyntaxError class definition in method body can be bypassed (jeremyevans0)
- Is this expected behavior, or a bug?
- If this is considered a bug, I expect fixing it may result in significant backwards compatibility issues.
- [Bug #19231] Integer#step and Float::INFINITY - inconsistent behaviour when called with and without a block (jeremyevans0)
- Returns float without block, yields integer with block.
- Behavior should probably be consistent.
- I think it's would make the most sense to always return and yield integer if step is integer, because Integer + Integer should result in Integer.
- However, with non-infinite float as the
to
value, it returns and yields floats, so returning/yielding integer would be inconsistent with that. - How should this be handled?
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 4 months ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Actions
Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0