Feature #3001: Ruby stdlib: Benchmark::Tms #memberwise drops labels

[Ernest Prabhakar]

=begin
http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib/libdoc/benchmark/rdoc/classes/Benchmark/Tms.html#M000016-source

The implementation of Benchmark::Tms#memberwise only passes the computed time values when creating a new instance, e.g.:

     Benchmark::Tms.new(utime.__send__(op, x),
                        stime.__send__(op, x),
                        cutime.__send__(op, x),
                        cstime.__send__(op, x),
                        real.__send__(op, x)
                        )

It would seem consistent (and more informative) if it also passed in the current label (especially since there's no other way to set it):

     Benchmark::Tms.new(utime.__send__(op, x),
                        stime.__send__(op, x),
                        cutime.__send__(op, x),
                        cstime.__send__(op, x),
                        real.__send__(op, x),
                        label
                        )

Example:

t = Benchmark.measure("foo") { sleep 0.1 }
=> #
t2 = t / 2
=> #
=end

[Yusuke Endoh]

=begin
Hi,

It would seem consistent (and more informative) if it also passed in the current label (especially since there's no other way to set it):

It is confusing to preserve the entirely same label, I guess.

If you really need the feature, a "derived" mark would be better,
such as "foo (/ 2)"

Viewed in this light, this is a new feature rather than bug.
So I move this ticket into Feature tracker.

--
Yusuke Endoh [e-mail]
=end

[Yusuke Endoh]

• Target version set to 2.0.0

=begin

=end

[Eric Hodel]

• Category set to lib

[Benoit Daloze]

Hi,

It would seem consistent (and more informative) if it also passed in the current label (especially since there's no other way to set it):

What about (tms1 + tms2)'s label ? Should it be "#{tms1.label} #{op} #{tms2.label}" ?
It seems consistent for operations with both Tms and others ("foo / 2").

But I'm not sure how this would be useful, could you give me an example ?
Maybe the need is somewhere else.

[Hiroshi Nakamura]

• Status changed from Open to Feedback

[Koichi Sasada]

• Target version changed from 2.0.0 to next minor

I changed target to next minor because there is no discussion on it.
No feedback?