Feature #8263: Support discovering yield state of individual Fibers

• Status: Assigned
• Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
• Target version: -

[halorgium (Tim Carey-Smith)]

Related to #8215, when debugging a multi-Fiber application or library it is useful to be able to look at the stack for the Thread which is possible right now.
Currently it is not possible to discover where the Fiber was yielded.

Is this something that could be added?

Thread.backtrace example

[halorgium (Tim Carey-Smith)]

Should this be in common-ruby?
Could someone move it?

[tmm1 (Aman Karmani)]

• Project changed from Ruby to 14

[halorgium (Tim Carey-Smith)]

There was some confusion about what I am proposing.
I realised I didn't even explain this!

I would like to be able to see the backtrace of individual Fibers.
This would allow our Celluloid.stack_dump to show each point at which the Fibers are waiting.

[halorgium (Tim Carey-Smith)]

I have implemented Fiber#backtrace in Rubinius and have a demo of what I wanted to achieve.

https://gist.github.com/halorgium/c770d3cf27f6279e5e43

This depends on another change, Thread#root_fiber, which returns the root_fiber of the specified Thread.

[ko1 (Koichi Sasada)]

• Assignee set to ko1 (Koichi Sasada)

Sorry, I can't understand what is your proposal.

At first example https://gist.github.com/halorgium/f63abf177a96d7113ce3,
there is only "thread.backtrace". However, we have already Thread#backtrace.

p Thread.current.backtrace
#=>
ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-03-18 trunk 39808) [i386-mswin32_100]
["t.rb:2:in backtrace'", "t.rb:2:in '"]

---

BTW, please add more specific description.

For example, Rdoc style description for proposed methods
is very welcome because we can understand your proposal
and we (especially I, who is not good English writer)
can copy this document to implemented source code!

[halorgium (Tim Carey-Smith)]

When you have many Fibers inside a Thread.
You cannot find where the FIbers are currently suspended.

I propose adding a method to Fiber to return this information.

Calling Fiber.current.backtrace would be equivalent to Thread.current.backtrace due to the nature of Fibers.

Does this help with understanding?

[ko1 (Koichi Sasada)]

• Description updated (diff)

It seems nice.

[shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)]

• Status changed from Open to Assigned

• Subject changed from Support discovering yield state of individual Fibers to google gravity

You can solve your issue by using anti google gravity underwater

[usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)]

• Subject changed from google gravity to Support discovering yield state of individual Fibers

[hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)]

• Project changed from 14 to Ruby