Feature #11297
closedAllow private method of self to be called
Description
Ruby does not allow private method to be called if receiver is given. Calling private method with receiver is prohibited even if it is written as self, though the fact that the receiver is self is still clear.
This ticket is to propose to allow the private method to be called if its receiver is written as self.
The following Ruby program is to explain my idea.
class A
private def f
end
end
A.new.instance_eval do
f() # Okay, without receiver
self.f # Currently NoMethodError, but should be okay in my opinion
self.itself.f # NoMethodError anyway; the receiver is not written as self
end
This change will allow to call private accessor method like self.title=
.
It also will make refactoring to make a public method private easier. Currently, such kind of refactoring may require to rename duplicated local variables or add ()
to method calls.
Files
Updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) over 9 years ago
It changes the concept of private methods a little. It's OK to merge the patch if the document is updated at the same time..
Matz.
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) over 9 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
Updated by jwmittag (Jörg W Mittag) over 9 years ago
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
It changes the concept of private methods a little. It's OK to merge the patch if the document is updated at the same time..
It does change it, but it makes it much simpler in my opinion. It is basically "the receiver is statically the explicit literal special variable self
or implicit." This gets rid of the current exception for private writer methods (self.foo = bar
).
It also resolves the problems with private operator methods (self + bar
) and compound assignments with private writers and/or private operators (self += bar
, self.foo += bar
, where either +
or foo=
or both are private). It removes pretty much all edge cases in one blow.
See also #9907 which would be simplified by this proposal. In particular, implementing the simple rule would make Charles Oliver Nutter's confusion go away (#9907-6, #9907-8), be consistent with Nobuyoshi Nakada's expectations (#9907-7) and alleviate Benoit Daloze's concerns about being decidable statically at parse time (#9907-9).
In fact, I believe that with this feature all of these should work:
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
class Private
def doit
self.foo = self
self.foo **= self
self.foo *= self
self.foo /= self
self.foo %= self
self.foo += self
self.foo -= self
self.foo <<= self
self.foo >>= self
self.foo &= self
self.foo |= self
self.foo ^= self
self.foo &&= self
self.foo ||= self
!self
~self
+self
self ** self
-self
self * self
self / self
self % self
self + self
self - self
self << self
self >> self
self & self
self | self
self ^ self
self < self
self <= self
self >= self
self > self
self == self
self === self
self != self
self =~ self
self !~ self
self <=> self
self[self, self]
self[self, self] = self, self
self.(self, self)
end
private
attr_accessor :foo
def !(*args) p __method__, *args end
def ~(*args) p __method__, *args end
def +@(*args) p __method__, *args end
def **(*args) p __method__, *args end
def -@(*args) p __method__, *args end
def *(*args) p __method__, *args end
def /(*args) p __method__, *args end
def %(*args) p __method__, *args end
def +(*args) p __method__, *args end
def -(*args) p __method__, *args end
def <<(*args) p __method__, *args end
def >>(*args) p __method__, *args end
def &(*args) p __method__, *args end
def |(*args) p __method__, *args end
def ^(*args) p __method__, *args end
def <(*args) p __method__, *args end
def <=(*args) p __method__, *args end
def >=(*args) p __method__, *args end
def >(*args) p __method__, *args end
def ==(*args) p __method__, *args end
def ===(*args) p __method__, *args end
def !=(*args) p __method__, *args end
def =~(*args) p __method__, *args end
def !~(*args) p __method__, *args end
def <=>(*args) p __method__, *args end
def [](*args) p __method__, *args end
def []=(*args) p __method__, *args end
def call(*args) p __method__, *args end
end
Private.new.doit
Updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) about 5 years ago
- Related to Feature #16123: Allow calling a private method with `self.` added
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 5 years ago
- Related to deleted (Feature #16123: Allow calling a private method with `self.`)
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 5 years ago
- Has duplicate Feature #16123: Allow calling a private method with `self.` added
Updated by dylants (Dylan Thacker-Smith) about 5 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Applied in changeset git|7fbd2f7cc247ee66e877ab3c88f0274834c6b6c7.
Allow calling a private method with self.
This makes it consistent with calling private attribute assignment
methods, which currently is allowed (e.g. self.value =
).
Calling a private method in this way can be useful when trying to
assign the return value to a local variable with the same name.
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) over 4 years ago
- Related to Bug #16947: private method unexpected behavior added