Actions
Misc #20717
closedDevMeeting-2024-10-03
Status:
Closed
Assignee:
-
Description
The next dev meeting¶
Date: 2024/10/03 13:00-17:00 (JST)
Log: https://github.com/ruby/dev-meeting-log/blob/master/2024/DevMeeting-2024-10-03.md
- Dev meeting IS NOT a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
- Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
- Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
- We will write a record of the discussion in the file or to each ticket in English.
- All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
- The date, time and place of the meeting are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.
- DO NOT discuss then on this ticket, please.
Call for agenda items¶
If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format:
* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
* Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.)
Example:
* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
* I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature.
- It is recommended to add a comment by 2024/09/30. We hold a preparatory meeting to create an agenda a few days before the dev-meeting.
- The format is strict. We'll use this script to automatically create an markdown-style agenda. We may ignore a comment that does not follow the format.
- Your comment is mandatory. We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time. We appreciate it if you could write a short summary and update from a previous discussion.
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 3 months ago
- Related to Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeeting added
Updated by byroot (Jean Boussier) 2 months ago
- [Misc #20746] Request to migrate the
json
gem fromflori/json
repository toruby/json
(byroot)- Current maintainers don't have full administrative rights over the repo, which is problematic.
- We've been trying to contact flori to try to resolve this situation with a transfer for over two years now, without success.
Updated by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) 2 months ago · Edited
- [Misc #20728] Add eileencodes as a core committer
- She's made many useful contributions
- She's currently helping to maintain Prism / Prism Compiler and it would be helpful if she can merge her own commits
Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 2 months ago · Edited
- [Feature #20750] Expose ruby_thread_has_gvl_p in ruby/thread.h (eregon)
- I think rb_thread_call_with_gvl() should be allowed if the GVL is already acquired, it seems a much nicer way to solve the use cases the OP pointed out (for a C function which can be called either with or without GVL).
- @ko1 (Koichi Sasada) What do you think, how do you want to solve that issue?
Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) about 2 months ago · Edited
- [Feature #10459] [PATCH] rfc3339 method for Time
- https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/b88d9af34fbc1c84ce2769ba02584eab2c28ac6e/activesupport/lib/active_support/time_with_zone.rb#L152
- It seems reasonable.
- We introduce that with C ext same as
xmlschema
?
- [Feature #17295] Feature: Create a directory and file with Pathname#touch
- I found same use case for that today. How about this?
- https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3706
- [Feature #17297] Feature: Introduce Pathname.mktmpdir
- How about this?
- https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3709
- [Feature #17294] Feature: Allow method chaining with Pathname#mkpath Pathname#rmtree
- How about this?
- https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3705
- [Feature #17296] Feature: Pathname#chmod use FileUtils.chmod instead of File
- It's reasonable and useful.
- Does anyone have concern?
- https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/3708
- [GH-2974] Pathname#mountpoint? to support bind mount
- Implement Pathname#chdir
- Does anyone know the reason why removing
chdir
? - https://github.com/ruby/pathname/pull/33
- Does anyone know the reason why removing
- [GH-2024] each_address should resolve for AAAA first
- Does anyone have any concern?
- https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2024
- [Feature #18127] Ractor-local version of Singleton
- What's the blocker for this?
Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) about 2 months ago · Edited
- [Feature #6012] Proc#source_location also return the column (eregon)
- How about
{Proc,Method,UnboundMethod}.source_location #=> [path, start_line, start_column, start_offset, end_line, end_column, end_offset]
? - How about
{Proc,Method,UnboundMethod}.code_location #=> object with path, start_line, start_column, start_offset, end_line, end_column, end_offset and code
? - It would avoid having to use RubyVM to find this information.
- If some do not like these APIs, what do they suggest instead?
- How about
Updated by byroot (Jean Boussier) about 2 months ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Actions
Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0