Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #20790

open

Syntax acceptance of `*x = p rescue p 1` is different between parse.y and prism

Added by tompng (tomoya ishida) about 2 months ago. Updated 15 days ago.

Status:
Open
Assignee:
-
Target version:
-
ruby -v:
ruby 3.4.0dev (2024-10-09T03:27:05Z master ed11a244dd) +PRISM [x86_64-linux]
[ruby-core:119488]

Description

*x = p rescue p 1 # syntax error in prism
*x = p 1 rescue p 1 # both syntax ok
x = p rescue p 1 # both syntax error
x = p 1 rescue p 1 # both syntax ok

Which is correct? If *x = p rescue p 1 is syntax valid, should x = p rescue p 1 also be syntax valid?


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to Ruby master - Bug #8279: Single-line rescue parsingClosedmatz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)Actions
Actions #1

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 17 days ago

  • Related to Bug #8279: Single-line rescue parsing added

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 17 days ago

Discussed at the dev meeting. Here is matz's preference.

                    # current parse.y behavior   # matz's preference
*x = p rescue p 1   # (*x = p) rescue (p 1)      # *x = (p rescue (p 1))
*x = p 1 rescue p 1 # (*x = p 1) rescue (p 1)    # *x = ((p 1) rescue (p 1))
a, b = p rescue p   # a, b = (p rescue p)        # as is
x = p rescue p      # x = (p rescue p)           # as is
x = p rescue p 1    # x = (p rescue p) 1 (ERROR) # x = (p rescue p 1)
x = p 1 rescue p 1  # x = ((p 1) rescue (p 1))   # as is

@yui-knk (Kaneko Yuichiro) @kddnewton (Kevin Newton) What do you think?

Updated by kddnewton (Kevin Newton) 15 days ago

That makes sense to me, we can make that work.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like0
Like0Like0Like0