Bug #4537
closedIncorrectly creating private method via attr_accessor
Added by ryanlecompte (Ryan LeCompte) over 13 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.
Description
The following fails with a failure to call "x=
" private method
String.send(:attr_accessor, :x)
s = ""
s.x = 100
The following works:
class String
self.send(:attr_accessor, :x)
end
s = ""
s.x = 100
Files
attr-visibility-4537.patch (2.75 KB) attr-visibility-4537.patch | jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans), 08/01/2019 12:08 AM |
Updated by ryanlecompte (Ryan LeCompte) over 13 years ago
The following fails with a failure to call "x=
" private method
String.send(:attr_accessor, :x)
s = ""
s.x = 100
The following works:
class String
self.send(:attr_accessor, :x)
end
s = ""
s.x = 100
Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) over 13 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Assigned
- Assignee set to ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) over 13 years ago
- Category set to core
- Target version set to 2.0.0
Behavior: It inherits current visibility (visibility of top-level is "private"). 1.8 also causes an exception. It seems to be a spec.
However, the following code:
::String.send(:define_method, :x=){|v|}
s = ''
s.x = 100
doesn't cause an exception. It seems to be an inconsistency.
The following code doesn't cause an exception on 1.9 and 1.8:
class C
private
::String.send(:define_method, :x=){|v|}
end
s = ''
s.x = 100
However, the following code causes an exception only on 1.8:
class C
private
define_method(:x=){|v|}
end
C.new.x = 10
I can't understand how should it be.
Possible solutions:
(1) Remain it as spec.
(2) All "attr_*" methods define all methods in public.
(3) others?
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) almost 12 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.0.0 to 2.6
No discussion.
Updated by bughit (bug hit) about 8 years ago
why should top level visibility (which applies to methods defined in the Object class) have any effect on other classes?
this also applies to any other module which you might be in
class Class1
end
module SomeUnrelatedModule
Class1.send(:attr_accessor, :public_attr)
private
Class1.send(:attr_accessor, :private_attr)
end
c1 = Class1.new
c1.public_attr
c1.private_attr
what does visibility in SomeUnrelatedModule have to do with methods defined in Class1?
methods defined on a given target module when the default definee at the point of definition is not the target module, should be public, since that's the default visibility
Class1.send(:define_method, :foo) {}
defines a public method
Class1.send(:attr_accessor, :foo)
should too
Updated by bughit (bug hit) about 8 years ago
define_method used to have the same (or similar) problem
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9005
which was fixed, so why shouldn't this be?
Updated by bughit (bug hit) about 8 years ago
- Assignee changed from ko1 (Koichi Sasada) to nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
@nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) shouldn't this get the same treatment as #9005
Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) about 8 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
- ruby -v changed from ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18 revision 30907) [x86_64-darwin10.7.0] to ruby 2.3.1p112 (2016-04-26 revision 54768) [x86_64-darwin15]
Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) about 8 years ago
- Status changed from Closed to Assigned
- Assignee changed from nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) to ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) about 8 years ago
Just FYI we looked at it in developer meeting today and agreed this is a bug that have yet to be fixed.
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) almost 8 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) almost 8 years ago
So we should choose
(2) All "attr_*" methods define all methods in public.
(on #3), right?
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) over 5 years ago
Attached is a patch that makes attr* methods handle visibility the same as define_method
, using the approach nobu developed for #9005. I think this behavior makes the most sense. Always defining attr* methods as public (approach (2)) breaks backwards compatibility in more cases, and could lead to security issues in cases where public methods are treated differently than private methods in regards to how user input is handled.
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) over 5 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
Seems fine.
BTW, it doesn't need to be the global String
.
diff --git a/test/ruby/test_module.rb b/test/ruby/test_module.rb
index cdc084c8bc..9e57692ca0 100644
--- a/test/ruby/test_module.rb
+++ b/test/ruby/test_module.rb
@@ -706,13 +706,16 @@
end
def test_attr_public_at_toplevel
- eval(<<-END, TOPLEVEL_BINDING)
- String.send(:attr_accessor, :x)
- String.send(:attr, :y)
- String.send(:attr_reader, :z)
- String.send(:attr_writer, :w)
+ s = Object.new
+ TOPLEVEL_BINDING.eval(<<-END).call(s.singleton_class)
+ proc do |c|
+ c.send(:attr_accessor, :x)
+ c.send(:attr, :y)
+ c.send(:attr_reader, :z)
+ c.send(:attr_writer, :w)
+ end
END
- s = ""
+
assert_nil s.x
s.x = 1
assert_equal 1, s.x
@@ -727,10 +730,6 @@
s.w = 4
assert_equal 4, s.instance_variable_get(:@w)
- ensure
- [:x, :x=, :y, :z, :w=].each do |meth|
- String.undef_method(meth) rescue nil
- end
end
def test_const_get_evaled
Updated by jeremyevans (Jeremy Evans) over 5 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
Applied in changeset git|ef45a57801a2ae8621b0cde59f11159f89f0a8dc.
Make attr* methods define public methods if self in caller is not same as receiver
Previously, attr* methods could be private even if not in the
private section of a class/module block.
This uses the same approach that ruby started using for define_method
in 1fc33199736f316dd71d0c551edbf514528ddde6.
Fixes [Bug #4537]