Bug #5754
closedDouble require bug in 1.9.3
Description
There appears a bug in the handling of concurrent requires of the same file. If a thread (t2) is waiting for another thread (t1) to finish requiring the file, but requiring the file raises an exception, t1 signals t2 and t2 tries to require the file itself. But due to how the loading table is managed, if t1 attempts to require the file again right away (or if another thread were to), it doesn't see an entry in the loading table even though t2 is currently loading the file. This causes t1 to begin requiring the file again or sometimes it raises a ThreadError instead. Here is the code I write for rubyspec to show the bug:
start = false
fin = false
$scratch = []
$con1_ready = false
$con1_raise = true
path = "path/to/content/below.rb"
t1_res = nil
t2_res = nil
t1 = Thread.new do
lambda {
require(path)
}.should raise_error(RuntimeError)
# This hits the bug. Because MRI removes it's internal lock from a table
# when the exception is raised, this #require doesn't see that t2 is
# in the middle of requiring the file, so this #require runs when it should
# not.
#
# Sometimes this raises a ThreadError also, but I'm not sure why.
t1_res = require(path)
Thread.pass until fin
$scratch << :t1_post
end
t2 = Thread.new do
Thread.pass until $con1_ready
begin
t2_res = require(path)
$scratch << :t2_post
ensure
fin = true
end
end
t1.join
t2.join
raise "bug" unless t1_res == false
raise "bug" unless t2_res == true
$scratch == [:con_pre, :con_pre, :con_post, :t2_post, :t1_post]
Here is the file being required:
$scratch << :con_pre
$con1_ready = true
sleep 0.5
if $con1_raise
$con1_raise = false
raise "con1"
end
sleep 0.5
$scratch << :con_post
Updated by evanphx (Evan Phoenix) about 13 years ago
I missed pruning out one bit from rubyspec so I've fixed it and put the code into a gist: https://gist.github.com/1469546
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 13 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
This issue was solved with changeset r34027.
Evan, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.
- load.c (load_unlock): all threads requiring one file should
share same loading barrier, so it must be kept alive while those
are waiting on it. [ruby-core:41618] [Bug #5754]
Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) about 13 years ago
- Status changed from Closed to Assigned
- Assignee set to nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)
By r34027, test_race_excption(TestRequire) fails as following:
test_race_excption(TestRequire) [/extdisk/chkbuild/chkbuild/tmp/build/ruby-trunk/20111214T140500Z/ruby/test/ruby/test_require.rb:393]:
[ruby-core:41618].
<[false, true]> expected but was
<[true, false]>.
http://www.rubyist.net/~akr/chkbuild/debian/ruby-trunk/log/20111214T140500Z.log.html.gz
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 13 years ago
- ruby -v changed from ruby 1.9.3p0 (2011-10-30 revision 33570) [x86_64-darwin11.2.0] to -
Hi,
(11/12/14 23:56), Yui NARUSE wrote:
By r34027, test_race_excption(TestRequire) fails as following:
test_race_excption(TestRequire) [/extdisk/chkbuild/chkbuild/tmp/build/ruby-trunk/20111214T140500Z/ruby/test/ruby/test_require.rb:393]:
[ruby-core:41618].
<[false, true]> expected but was
<[true, false]>.http://www.rubyist.net/~akr/chkbuild/debian/ruby-trunk/log/20111214T140500Z.log.html.gz
It sounds like a timing bug in the test code.
--
Nobu Nakada
Updated by funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov) about 13 years ago
it doesn't see an entry in the loading table even though t2 is currently loading the file
Has it something common with #5727 ?
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 13 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
This issue was solved with changeset r34039.
Evan, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.
- load.c (load_unlock): release loading barrier and then remove it
from loading_table if it is not in-use. [Bug #5754] - thread.c (rb_barrier_release, rb_barrier_destroy): return
whether any other threads are waiting on it.