Bug #6343
closedImproved Fiber documentation
Added by andhapp (Anuj Dutta) over 12 years ago. Updated over 12 years ago.
Description
Added an example for Fiber's transfer. Patch Attached.
Files
Added-documentation-for-fiber-transfer.patch (1.15 KB) Added-documentation-for-fiber-transfer.patch | andhapp (Anuj Dutta), 04/23/2012 02:40 PM |
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) over 12 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Assigned
Updated by ayumin (Ayumu AIZAWA) over 12 years ago
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
This issue was solved with changeset r35519.
Anuj, thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.
- cont.c: Improved Fiber documentation.[ruby-core:44540][Bug #6343]
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) over 12 years ago
Hi,
We shouldn't mix Fiber#yield, Fiber.resume and Fiber.transfer. In other
words, fiber1 shouldn't use Fiber#resume on the your example.
I think it is a bug of current Ruby.
--
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net
Updated by andhapp (Anuj Dutta) over 12 years ago
Hi,
Thanks ko1 for your comment. The example doesn't use Fiber#resume on fiber1. It uses Fiber.yield to return to the calling context. However, can you please explain how it should work? I mean, why do you think it's a bug?
Thanks.
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) over 12 years ago
(2012/05/03 8:12), andhapp (Anuj Dutta) wrote:
Thanks ko1 for your comment. The example doesn't use Fiber#resume on fiber1. It uses Fiber.yield to return to the calling context. However, can you please explain how it should work? I mean, why do you think it's a bug?
You shouldn't use Fiber.yield for "transferred" fiber (in this case, f1).
require 'fiber'
f1 = f2 = f3 = nil
f1 = Fiber.new{
p:f1
f2.transfer
p:f2
}
f2 = Fiber.new{
p:f2
Fiber.yield
}
p:a
f1.resume
p:b
In this case, what do you expect?
Output:
ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-05-01 trunk 35505) [i386-mswin32_100]
:a
:f1
:f2
:b
Sequence:
Root f1 f2
p:a
f1.yield
p:f1
f2.transfer
p:f2
Fiber.yield (*1)
p:b
Transferred fiber didn't know which fiber should it return to. So root
fiber was selected. I think it can cause error (FiberError because
transferred fiber should not use "Fiber.yield"). This is why I think
ruby's bug.
The following code cause an error.
require 'fiber'
fr = Fiber.current
f1 = Fiber.new{
fr.transfer
}
f1.resume
Fiber.yield
#=>
ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-05-01 trunk 35505) [i386-mswin32_100]
t.rb:8:in yield': can't yield from root fiber (FiberError) from t.rb:8:in
'
Regards,
Koichi
--
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net
Updated by andhapp (Anuj Dutta) over 12 years ago
Thanks, ok that makes sense. What should happen if someone does try and yield from a fiber that has been transferred control to from some other fiber? I will add it to RubySpec which is currently missing the spec for Fiber transfer. Thanks.
Anuj