Feature #7378
closed
Hello,
Your feature requests sound very logical to me, and I actually made a path manipulation library called "Path" [1]
Notably, #write, #glob and #touch are already implemented as you propose and #start_with? functionality is implemented by #inside?.
I would love to see @akr's opinion on this and to have a path manipulation class in core with these additions and others which are present in Path and other libraries.
[1] https://github.com/eregon/path
On 17/11/12 12:46, Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote:
Issue #7378 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
Hello,
Your feature requests sound very logical to me, and I actually made a path manipulation library called "Path" [1]
Notably, #write, #glob and #touch are already implemented as you propose and #start_with? functionality is implemented by #inside?.
I would love to see @akr's opinion on this and to have a path manipulation class in core with these additions and others which are present in Path and other libraries.
[1] https://github.com/eregon/path
I've written almost exactly this code myself in the past, even down to
the Path constant :-) I'd love to see this promoted to stdlib.
--
Alex
I definitely also have written Pathname#write, and used it. Please provide a patch, that should help getting it included.
- Status changed from Open to Assigned
- Target version set to 2.6
- Status changed from Assigned to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
This issue was solved with changeset r40107.
Alexander E., thank you for reporting this issue.
Your contribution to Ruby is greatly appreciated.
May Ruby be with you.
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0