My reading of https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-master/wiki/RefinementsSpec#Scope-of-refinements is that the expected output here is:
A refinement is activated in a certain scope.The scope of a refinement is lexical in the sense that, when control is transferred outside the scope (e.g., by an invocation of a method defined outside the scope, by load/require, etc...), the refinement is deactivated.In the body of a method defined in a scope where a refinement is activated, the refinement is activated even if the method is invoked outside the scope.
Given the scope is limited by class
/module
keywords like constant scopes (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11779#note-31), it should be:
Example#test
Example#test in M1
Example#test
Example#test in M1
which is what TruffleRuby does currently.
Seeing both M1 and M2 from the same call site wouldn't be lexical.
The reason we don't see M2 there is changing the refinements for a scope after there have been calls is AFAIK an incorrect usages of refinements (ideally using
would raise for such a case, but it might be difficult to detect).
In other words, refinements at a given call site must always be the same and so it's enough to consider refinements during the initial lookup for the cache and not after.
This is the key point after the very long discussion on the mailing list about the original design of refinements (at least that's what I recall from it), they must not have dynamic rebinding so they don't have extra cost (e.g. on non-refined method calls when in a scope with some refinements activated, and also obviously nobody wants to check if there are active refinements at every call site), the refinements for a given call site should be fixed and never change. If they change, it's an incorrect usage and it should be fair to just ignore the change (what TruffleRuby does, or even better to raise an error in that case).
In practice, I believe real usages of using
are only early at the top-level, much like require
, and maybe sometimes at the beginning of a module
/class
body.
Both of these are fine and can't run into this problem (well, except if they meant to refine
require
but then it's only natural to call using
before require
).
@shugo (Shugo Maeda) What do you think about this?
I think we should try to raise an error for using
in such invalid cases.
That would make it much easier to fix #18572 on CRuby and allow simplifying the implementation of refinements on CRuby (e.g., TruffleRuby doesn't track if a method has refinements).