Feature #21126
closedDrop default_proc when Hash#freeze is called for better Ractor support
Description
Hash instances with default_proc set cannot be sent/moved across Ractors, even if they are frozen.
Consider the following code. Using a default proc to set an empty Array is a very common pattern, even introduced in the docs.
h = Hash.new {|h, k| h[k] = [] }
h[:foo] << 1
h.freeze
Ractor.new(h) {|h| p h }.take # <internal:ractor>:282:in 'Ractor.new': allocator undefined for Proc (TypeError)
https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/3.4/Hash.html#class-Hash-label-Default+Proc
One must explicitly call h.default_proc = nil
before sending the hash to another Ractor.
This isn't the most friendly way for the programmer since (1) it is not easy to spot that the default hash is rendering the Hash unsendable, and (2) Hash#default_proc=
isn't a widely known API anyway (at least from my perspective).
Proposal¶
Automatically drop the default
default_proc
when Hash#freeze is called. They have little use after the Hash gets frozen.
Nevertheless, it should be pointed out that this is an incompatibility for Hash#default
Hash#default_proc
-- they currently return the original value, but they will return nil
.
Patch: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/12717
Dropping the default_proc on Hash#freeze
will also be nicer for Ractor.make_shareable
users, since it does not require users to find the particular Hash with the default_proc buried somewhere.
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) 13 days ago
I think this is a bad idea. It makes freeze
change the hash in a non-backwards compatible way.
For Hash#default
, I think it makes no sense at all:
h = Hash.new(0)
h[1] # 0
h.freeze
h[1] # Before: 0, After: nil
What is the explanation for dropping default
in this case? It shouldn't even make the hash ractor unsharable, as long as the default value is ractor sharable.
For Hash#default_proc
, in the case where the proc does not modify the hash, the issue is the same. It's possible to use a ractor sharable default proc:
pr = Ractor.make_shareable(Object.class_eval{proc{0}})
h = Hash.new(&pr)
h[1] # 0
h.freeze
h[1] # Before: 0, After: nil
For the case where the default proc is modifying the hash, triggering the default proc should result in a FrozenError:
h = Hash.new{|h,k| h[k] = 0}
h[1] # 0
h.freeze
h[1] # 0
h[2] # Before: FrozenError, After: nil
I expect this proposal would break a substantial number of Ruby libraries and applications. I think we should not break backwards compatibility to work around Ractor limitations.
Updated by byroot (Jean Boussier) 13 days ago
I was about to write the same thing as @jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans), the default_proc
doesn't necessarily mutate the hash, hence dropping it on freeze isn't correct.
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) 12 days ago
- Related to Feature #19326: Please add a better API for passing a Proc to a Ractor added
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) 12 days ago
- Related to Feature #18162: Shorthand method Proc#isolate to create isolated proc objects added
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) 12 days ago
- Related to Feature #17284: Shareable Proc added
Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 12 days ago
- Status changed from Open to Rejected
Looks like we are on the same page here, freeze
should never break semantics like this.