Actions
Misc #19040
closedDevMeeting-2022-10-20
Status:
Closed
Assignee:
-
Description
The next dev meeting¶
Date: 2022/10/20 13:00-17:00 (JST)
Log: https://github.com/ruby/dev-meeting-log/blob/master/DevMeeting-2022-10-20.md
- Dev meeting IS NOT a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
- Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
- Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
- We will write a record of the discussion in the file or to each ticket in English.
- All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
- The date, time and place of the meeting are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.
- DO NOT discuss then on this ticket, please.
Call for agenda items¶
If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format:
* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
* Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.)
Example:
* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
* I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature.
- It is recommended to add a comment by 2022/10/17. We hold a preparatory meeting to create an agenda a few days before the dev-meeting.
- The format is strict. We'll use this script to automatically create an markdown-style agenda. We may ignore a comment that does not follow the format.
- Your comment is mandatory. We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time. We appreciate it if you could write a short summary and update from a previous discussion.
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) about 2 years ago
- Related to Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeeting added
Updated by ufuk (Ufuk Kayserilioglu) about 2 years ago
- [Feature #12084] Add
Class#attached_object
(ufuk)- The proposed method returns the object that the receiver is the singleton class for, and raises
TypeError
if the receiver is not a singleton class. - There is one particular use-case for this method when doing introspection, with no good workaround available.
- PR is ready with tests and documentation and issue already has some :+1:.
- Should we have this method for Ruby 3.2?
- The proposed method returns the object that the receiver is the singleton class for, and raises
Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) about 2 years ago
- [Bug #19033] One-liner pattern match as Boolean arg syntax error (jeremyevans0)
-
m(a in b)
is syntax error, similar to howm(a if b)
is a syntax error -
m a in b
is a syntax error, butm a if b
is not (parsed asm(a) if b
) -
m((a in b))
andm((a if b))
are both valid syntax - Should we attempt to support
m(a in b)
,m(a if b)
, and/orm a in b
?
-
- [Bug #18998] Kernel#Integer does not convert SimpleDelegator object expectly (jeremyevans0)
- I think this behavior is expected and not a bug.
- Should core methods attempt to deal specially with objects using stdlib delegate library?
- [Bug #18983] Range#size for beginless Range is not nil. (jeremyevans0)
-
(..object).size
returns Infinity and(object..).size
returns nil for non-numeric objects - Should we change
(..object).size
to return nil instead of Infinity?
-
- [Bug #18797] Third argument to Regexp.new is a bit broken (jeremyevans0)
- This was discussed in the August 2022 developer meeting, but there was confusion about whether the third argument is ignored or used.
- @matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) thought the third argument was ignored, but it is used and results in unexpected behavior.
- Should I update the documentation, or should the third argument be deprecated and removed?
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) almost 2 years ago
- [Bug #19055] Regexp.new(regexp, timeout: nil) is intrupted by Regexp.timeout (mame)
- How should we design the timeout keyword to express "no timeout"?
Regexp.new(str, timeout: nil)
Regexp.new(str, timeout: 0)
Regexp.new(str, timeout: Float::INFINITY)
Regexp.new(str, timeout: :no_timeout)
Updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) almost 2 years ago
- [Feature #19056] Introduce
Fiber.annotation
for attaching messages to fibers.- Do we accept the proposed interface?
- [Feature #19062] Introduce
Fiber#locals
for shared inheritable state.- Related to [Feature #19058] Introduce
Fiber.inheritable
attributes/variables for dealing with shared state. - Can we introduce it?
- Related to [Feature #19058] Introduce
- [Feature #19059] Introduce top level
module TimeoutError
for aggregating various timeout error classes.- @matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) can you give your opinion and/or close the issue?
- [Feature #19063] Hash.new with non-value objects should be less confusing.
- Discuss proposals.
Updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev) almost 2 years ago
- [Feature #19061] Proposal: make a concept of "consuming enumerator" explicit (zverok)
- Introduce an
Enumerator#consuming?
method that will allow telling one of the other (and make core enumerators like#each_line
properly report they are consuming). - Introduce
consuming: true
parameter forEnumerator.new
so it would be easy for user's code to specify the flag - Introduce
Enumerator#consuming
method to produce a consuming enumerator from a non-consuming one
- Introduce an
Updated by shioyama (Chris Salzberg) almost 2 years ago
- [Bug #19067] Module methods not usable at toplevel under wrapped script
- Similar to #18960
- Based on my understanding of the
wrap
module, this should work, buttop_self
currently extends thewrap
module. - Up to 3.2,
wrap
was an anonymous module (or no wrap). But now it can be passed in as an argument. - This creates some confusion around what methods are callable. I think it should be clarified what is expected.
- Maybe different handling of boolean/module
wrap
?
Updated by yui-knk (Kaneko Yuichiro) almost 2 years ago
Updated by duerst (Martin Dürst) almost 2 years ago
- [Feature #19066] Enable Scorecard Github Action
- I don't know the details, but at first sight, it seems worth doing
Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) almost 2 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Actions
Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0