Project

General

Profile

Actions

Misc #21399

open

DevMeeting-2025-07-10

Added by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 22 days ago. Updated about 23 hours ago.

Status:
Open
Assignee:
-
[ruby-core:122452]

Description

The next dev meeting

Date: 2025/07/10 13:00-17:00 (JST)
Log: TBD

  • Dev meeting IS NOT a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
  • Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
  • Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
  • We will write a record of the discussion in the file or to each ticket in English.
  • All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
  • The date, time and place of the meeting are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.
  • DO NOT discuss then on this ticket, please.

Call for agenda items

If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format:

* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
  * Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.)

Example:

* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
  * I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature.
  • It is recommended to add a comment by 2025/07/07. We hold a preparatory meeting to create an agenda a few days before the dev-meeting.
  • The format is strict. We'll use this script to automatically create an markdown-style agenda. We may ignore a comment that does not follow the format.
  • Your comment is mandatory. We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time. We appreciate it if you could write a short summary and update from a previous discussion.

Related issues 1 (1 open0 closed)

Related to Ruby - Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeetingOpenActions
Actions #1

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 22 days ago

  • Related to Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeeting added

Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 4 days ago · Edited

  • [Feature #17473] Make Pathname to embedded class of Ruby (eregon)
    • Related to that issue and discussed there, I made a PR to define most of Pathname in Ruby: https://github.com/ruby/pathname/pull/53
    • It's faster, easier to read and maintain and enables sharing most of the Pathname implementation between Ruby implementations.
    • Could @akr (Akira Tanaka) review it? I wrote him on Slack but got no reply, maybe a committer knows better how to contact him?
    • If @akr (Akira Tanaka) is not available, please let me know and I will try to find another reviewer.

Updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 4 days ago · Edited

  • [Bug #19473] can't be called from trap context (ThreadError) is too limiting
  • [Bug #21360] Inconsistent Support for Exception#cause in Fiber#raise and Thread#raise
    • Can we fix the consistency issues?

Updated by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson) 2 days ago

  • [Feature #21140] Add a method for getting addresses of certain functions for 3rd party JITs
    • RJIT has been extracted to a gem, but it can't work without getting the address of certain functions
    • Not all JIT related functions are exported, so dlsym can't get the address
    • Proposed API is like this: RubyVM::Internals.address_of(:rb_vm_ci_argc), where rb_vm_ci_argc is the function we want the address for
      • If the function exists, it returns the address
      • If not, it returns nil
    • This API should not make guarantees about stability or portability
    • I have no strong feelings about the method or constant name, but RubyVM::Internals tries to communicate this is an internal and unstable API

Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) 1 day ago

  • [Feature #21442] Make tsort to bundled gems
    • Any objection for this?

Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) about 23 hours ago

  • [Feature #21039] Ractor.make_shareable breaks block semantics (seeing updated captured variables) of existing blocks
    • How about Ractor.make_shareable { ... } which only allows literal block?
    • That avoids the well known problem of a block body being reinterpreted in different ways (like the same block as proc & lambda, or in this issue like a regular block and a block-with-snapshot-of-the-environment).
    • See https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21039#note-11 for details
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0