Feature #8923
closedUpdated by Hanmac (Hans Mackowiak) about 11 years ago
they are a bit different with methods, because defining singleton methods on them redirects to the curresponding Class
but yes, instance variables on them doesnt make much sense
Updated by headius (Charles Nutter) about 11 years ago
I obviously support this :-)
Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) almost 11 years ago
- Target version changed from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) over 10 years ago
Matz, what do you think about it?
Updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) about 10 years ago
I agreed with making those values, if no significant comparability problem happens.
Please experiment.
Matz.
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 10 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
Updated by Hanmac (Hans Mackowiak) about 10 years ago
i am unsure about toally freeze them ... some might extend/include some "Boolean" module into true/false or the TrueClass/FalseClass to specially check if a value is only true or false
i dont know if freezing this objects would break such a thing ...
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) about 10 years ago
The following patch makes test-all green.
Index: gc.c
===================================================================
--- gc.c (revision 47513)
+++ gc.c (working copy)
@@ -2286,11 +2286,11 @@ should_be_callable(VALUE block)
static void
should_be_finalizable(VALUE obj)
{
- rb_check_frozen(obj);
if (!FL_ABLE(obj)) {
rb_raise(rb_eArgError, "cannot define finalizer for %s",
rb_obj_classname(obj));
}
+ rb_check_frozen(obj);
}
/*
Index: include/ruby/ruby.h
===================================================================
--- include/ruby/ruby.h (revision 47513)
+++ include/ruby/ruby.h (working copy)
@@ -1126,7 +1126,7 @@ struct RStruct {
(OBJ_TAINTABLE(x) && FL_ABLE(s)) ? \
RBASIC(x)->flags |= RBASIC(s)->flags & FL_TAINT : 0)
-#define OBJ_FROZEN(x) (!!(FL_ABLE(x)?(RBASIC(x)->flags&(FL_FREEZE)):(FIXNUM_P(x)||FLONUM_P(x)||STATIC_SYM_P(x))))
+#define OBJ_FROZEN(x) (!!(FL_ABLE(x)?(RBASIC(x)->flags&(FL_FREEZE)):1))
#define OBJ_FREEZE(x) FL_SET((x), FL_FREEZE)
#if USE_RGENGC
Index: object.c
===================================================================
--- object.c (revision 47513)
+++ object.c (working copy)
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ rb_obj_tainted(VALUE obj)
VALUE
rb_obj_taint(VALUE obj)
{
- if (!OBJ_TAINTED(obj)) {
+ if (!OBJ_TAINTED(obj) && OBJ_TAINTABLE(obj)) {
rb_check_frozen(obj);
OBJ_TAINT(obj);
}
@@ -1057,8 +1057,6 @@ rb_obj_infect(VALUE obj1, VALUE obj2)
OBJ_INFECT(obj1, obj2);
}
-static st_table *immediate_frozen_tbl = 0;
-
/*
* call-seq:
* obj.freeze -> obj
@@ -1089,10 +1087,7 @@ rb_obj_freeze(VALUE obj)
if (!OBJ_FROZEN(obj)) {
OBJ_FREEZE(obj);
if (SPECIAL_CONST_P(obj)) {
- if (!immediate_frozen_tbl) {
- immediate_frozen_tbl = st_init_numtable();
- }
- st_insert(immediate_frozen_tbl, obj, (st_data_t)Qtrue);
+ rb_bug("special consts should be frozen.");
}
}
return obj;
@@ -1112,12 +1107,7 @@ rb_obj_freeze(VALUE obj)
VALUE
rb_obj_frozen_p(VALUE obj)
{
- if (OBJ_FROZEN(obj)) return Qtrue;
- if (SPECIAL_CONST_P(obj)) {
- if (!immediate_frozen_tbl) return Qfalse;
- if (st_lookup(immediate_frozen_tbl, obj, 0)) return Qtrue;
- }
- return Qfalse;
+ return OBJ_FROZEN(obj) ? Qtrue : Qfalse;
}
Index: test/ruby/test_eval.rb
===================================================================
--- test/ruby/test_eval.rb (revision 47513)
+++ test/ruby/test_eval.rb (working copy)
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ class TestEval < Test::Unit::TestCase
def forall_TYPE
objects = [Object.new, [], nil, true, false] # TODO: check
objects.each do |obj|
- obj.instance_variable_set :@ivar, 12
+ obj.instance_variable_set :@ivar, 12 unless obj.frozen?
yield obj
end
end
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ class TestEval < Test::Unit::TestCase
assert_equal :sym, o.instance_eval(":sym")
assert_equal 11, o.instance_eval("11")
- assert_equal 12, o.instance_eval("@ivar")
+ assert_equal 12, o.instance_eval("@ivar") unless o.frozen?
assert_equal 13, o.instance_eval("@@cvar")
assert_equal 14, o.instance_eval("$gvar__eval")
assert_equal 15, o.instance_eval("Const")
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ class TestEval < Test::Unit::TestCase
assert_equal "19", o.instance_eval(%q("1#{9}"))
1.times {
- assert_equal 12, o.instance_eval("@ivar")
+ assert_equal 12, o.instance_eval("@ivar") unless o.frozen?
assert_equal 13, o.instance_eval("@@cvar")
assert_equal 14, o.instance_eval("$gvar__eval")
assert_equal 15, o.instance_eval("Const")
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ class TestEval < Test::Unit::TestCase
assert_equal :sym, o.instance_eval { :sym }
assert_equal 11, o.instance_eval { 11 }
- assert_equal 12, o.instance_eval { @ivar }
+ assert_equal 12, o.instance_eval { @ivar } unless o.frozen?
assert_equal 13, o.instance_eval { @@cvar }
assert_equal 14, o.instance_eval { $gvar__eval }
assert_equal 15, o.instance_eval { Const }
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ class TestEval < Test::Unit::TestCase
assert_equal "19", o.instance_eval { "1#{9}" }
1.times {
- assert_equal 12, o.instance_eval { @ivar }
+ assert_equal 12, o.instance_eval { @ivar } unless o.frozen?
assert_equal 13, o.instance_eval { @@cvar }
assert_equal 14, o.instance_eval { $gvar__eval }
assert_equal 15, o.instance_eval { Const }
Index: test/ruby/test_weakmap.rb
===================================================================
--- test/ruby/test_weakmap.rb (revision 47513)
+++ test/ruby/test_weakmap.rb (working copy)
@@ -19,13 +19,13 @@ class TestWeakMap < Test::Unit::TestCase
assert_raise(ArgumentError) {@wm[true] = x}
assert_raise(ArgumentError) {@wm[false] = x}
assert_raise(ArgumentError) {@wm[nil] = x}
- assert_raise(RuntimeError) {@wm[42] = x}
- assert_raise(RuntimeError) {@wm[:foo] = x}
+ assert_raise(ArgumentError) {@wm[42] = x}
+ assert_raise(ArgumentError) {@wm[:foo] = x}
assert_raise(ArgumentError) {@wm[x] = true}
assert_raise(ArgumentError) {@wm[x] = false}
assert_raise(ArgumentError) {@wm[x] = nil}
- assert_raise(RuntimeError) {@wm[x] = 42}
- assert_raise(RuntimeError) {@wm[x] = :foo}
+ assert_raise(ArgumentError) {@wm[x] = 42}
+ assert_raise(ArgumentError) {@wm[x] = :foo}
end
def test_include?
Updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada) about 10 years ago
Hans Mackowiak wrote:
i am unsure about toally freeze them ... some might extend/include some "Boolean" module into true/false or the TrueClass/FalseClass to specially check if a value is only true or false
i dont know if freezing this objects would break such a thing ...
p true.frozen? #=> true
module Boolean; end
class TrueClass
include Boolean
end
p true.kind_of?(Boolean) #=> true
Not freeze TrueClass, but freeze true object.
Updated by fxn (Xavier Noria) about 10 years ago
Hans Mackowiak wrote:
i am unsure about toally freeze them ... some might extend/include some "Boolean" module into true/false or the TrueClass/FalseClass to specially check if a value is only true or false
Can you explain that use case a little further?
Updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) about 10 years ago
@ko1 (Koichi Sasada) you have proven there's no significant issue. Go ahead.
Of course, we might have to revert it if something happens outside of test suites.
Matz.
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 10 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset r47525.
test_object.rb: add assertions
- test/ruby/test_object.rb (test_freeze_immediate): assertions for
[Feature #8923].