Bug #9600
closedsysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX) is just a hint for getgrnam_r()
Description
When there is a group that has a lot of members, TestProcess#test_execopts_gid fails. Following is a more simple example:
$ ruby -e 'system("true", gid: "largegroup")'
-e:1:in `system': Numerical result out of range - getgrnam_r (Errno::ERANGE)
from -e:1:in `<main>'
This wrong exception happens because obj2gid() in process.c calls getgrnam_r() with a buffer that was allocated based on the size returned by sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX). In Linux, sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX) returns 1024, but actually this value is just a hint, so obj2gid() should gradually extend the buffer until getgrnam_r() no longer throws ERANGE.
The same issue was reported in the following page:
http://tomlee.co/2012/10/problems-with-large-linux-unix-groups-and-getgrgid_r-getgrnam_r/
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 9 years ago
Isn't there any way to get the real number?
Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) about 9 years ago
Rei Odaira wrote:
but actually this value is just a hint, so obj2gid() should gradually extend the buffer until getgrnam_r() no longer throws ERANGE.
SuSv7 changes it.
- http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/getgrnam.html v6's getgrnam_r
- http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/getgrnam.html v7's getgrnam_r
- http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/sysconf.html v7's sysconf
SD5-XSH-ERN-166 is applied, changing "Maximum size" to "Initial size" for the "Maximum size of ..." entries in the table in the DESCRIPTION.
But I didn't find SD5-XSH-ERN-166 itself.
Updated by akr (Akira Tanaka) about 9 years ago
Off topic.
Yui NARUSE wrote:
SuSv7 changes it.
There is no Single Unix Specification version 7 (yet).
The issue number is not the version number.
SUSv3:
| The Single UNIX Specification, Version 3 is made up of the Base Specifications, Issue 6 and
| X/Open Curses, Issue 4, Version 2.
http://www.unix.org/version3/sus_contents.html
SUSv4:
| The Single UNIX Specification uses The Open Group Base Specifications, Issue 7 documentation as its core.
| The documentation is structured as follows:
| * The Base Specifications, Issue 7, composed of:
| - Base Definitions, Issue 7 (XBD7)
| - System Interfaces, Issue 7 (XSH7)
| - Shell and Utilities, Issue 7 (XCU7)
| - Rationale, Issue 7, (XRAT7) (Informative)
| * X/Open Curses, Issue 7
http://www.unix.org/version4/overview.html
Updated by djberg96 (Daniel Berger) about 9 years ago
I don't think there's a way to get it. You'll have to rescue and retry with a realloc'ed buffer.
One bit of trickiness is that different platforms seem to set errno to different values on different platforms. In my own sys-admin gem, I caught Errno::ERANGE on Linux and Solaris, while on Darwin it was Errno::ENOENT, and on FreeBSD it was Errno::ENOTTY.
Updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) about 9 years ago
- Status changed from Open to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset r45290.
process.c: expand buffer on ERANGE
- process.c (obj2uid, obj2gid): now getpwnam_r() and getgrnam_r()
may need larger buffers than sysconf values, so retry with
expanding the buffer when ERANGE is returned.
[ruby-core:61325] [Bug #9600]
Updated by ReiOdaira (Rei Odaira) about 9 years ago
Wouldn't it be possible to backport this to 2.0.0 and 2.1, where the same issue resides?
Updated by naruse (Yui NARUSE) about 9 years ago
- Backport changed from 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN to 1.9.3: REQUIRED, 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED
Updated by nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga) almost 9 years ago
- Backport changed from 1.9.3: REQUIRED, 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED to 1.9.3: REQUIRED, 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: DONE
r45287, r45288, r45289 and r45290 were backported into ruby_2_1
branch at r46449.
Updated by usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) almost 9 years ago
- Backport changed from 1.9.3: REQUIRED, 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: DONE to 1.9.3: REQUIRED, 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: DONE
backported into ruby_2_0_0
at r46511.