Project

General

Profile

Actions

Misc #20075

closed

DevMeeting-2024-01-17

Added by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 4 months ago. Updated 3 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Assignee:
-
[ruby-core:115830]

Description

The next dev meeting

Date: 2024/01/17 13:00-17:00 (JST)
Log: https://github.com/ruby/dev-meeting-log/blob/master/2024/DevMeeting-2024-01-17.md

  • Dev meeting IS NOT a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
  • Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
  • Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
  • We will write a record of the discussion in the file or to each ticket in English.
  • All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
  • The date, time and place of the meeting are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.
  • DO NOT discuss then on this ticket, please.

Call for agenda items

If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format:

* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
  * Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.)

Example:

* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
  * I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature.
  • It is recommended to add a comment by 2024/01/14. We hold a preparatory meeting to create an agenda a few days before the dev-meeting.
  • The format is strict. We'll use this script to automatically create an markdown-style agenda. We may ignore a comment that does not follow the format.
  • Your comment is mandatory. We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time. We appreciate it if you could write a short summary and update from a previous discussion.

Related issues 1 (1 open0 closed)

Related to Ruby master - Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeetingOpenActions
Actions #1

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 4 months ago

  • Related to Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeeting added

Updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 4 months ago

  • [Feature #20102] Introduce Fiber#resuming?
    • Can we introduce?
  • [Feature #19057] Hide implementation of rb_io_t.
    • Eric has agreed to release updated gems. Can we continue to move forward?
  • [Bug #19857] Eval coverage is reset after each eval.
    • Can we merge proposed fix?
  • [Feature #19742] Introduce Module#anonymous?
    • Can we accept definition "Anonymous module is one that does not have a permanent name"?
    • Can we introduce this interface?
  • [Feature #18035] Introduce general model/semantic for immutability.
    • Do we accept proposed syntax.
    • Do we accept proposed list of immutable classes?
  • [Feature #16495] Inconsistent quotes in error messages
    • Gathered feedback from major players in the industry. Is it sufficient to move forward?

Updated by matheusrich (Matheus Richard) 4 months ago

  • [Feature #13383] Module#source_location
    • Matz asked for specific use cases, so here are some:
      • Debugging/Code Discovery: Similar to Method#source_location, it would be
        useful to know where a module/class was defined (especially in large
        codebases).

        Doing a global search for module Foo is not always helpful because
        nesting might make it harder to find the right one. It can also come from
        a Gem.

        This can help navigating new codebases much easier/faster.

      • Documentation: It would be useful to know where a module/class was defined
        when reading the documentation. RDoc could use this to list all the places
        where a module/class was defined.

    • I think we should list all the locations, so it should be Module#source_locations

Updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) 4 months ago

  • [Feature #20066] Reduce Implicit Array/Hash Allocations For Method Calls Involving Splats (jeremyevans0)
    • This is a collection of 5 optimizations, some of which are independent.
    • The 4th and 5th allow for a performance optimization not currently possible, when using anonymous splats or ... argument forwarding instead of named splat forwarding.
      • I expect these optimizations to have the most impact, after code is updated to switch to anonymous splats or ... forwarding.
    • Currently, the patch slows down yjit-bench with YJIT, because YJIT does not implement the new instructions, or contain the same optimizations.
      • I expect yjit-bench with YJIT will speed up if YJIT implements the same optimizations.
    • Is it OK to merge the pull request as-is, or to merge a subset of the optimization patches?
  • [Bug #5179] Complex#rationalize and to_r with approximate zeros (jeremyevans0)
    • Discussed last at the January 2020 developer meeting (as part of #5321).
    • Considering we have Float#to_r, can we change Complex(1, 0.0).to_r to return Rational(1,1), as Complex(1, 0.0.to_r).to_r does?
  • [Bug #19918] Should a[&b]=c be syntax valid? (jeremyevans0)
    • This is currently valid syntax, and there are tests for it.
    • Should we change this to invalid syntax?
    • If we keep this syntax:
      • It currently evaluates c before b.
      • Should it be fixed to evaluate b before c?
  • [Bug #19542] Operations on zero-sized IO::Buffer are raising (jeremyevans0)
    • Is this behavior expected or a bug?

Updated by tagomoris (Satoshi Tagomori) 4 months ago

  • [Feature #20093] Syntax or keyword to reopen existing classes/modules, never to define new classes/modules
    • To make monkey-patching code more explicitly

Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 4 months ago

  • [Feature #18576] Rename ASCII-8BIT encoding to BINARY (eregon)
    • Can we experiment for 3.4 by making ASCII-8BIT the alias? If we have pushback based on actual code then let's go more conservative, but otherwise I think we should do the clean/consistent fix here.

Updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun) 4 months ago

  • [Feature #20182] Rewrite Array#each in Ruby (k0kubun)
    • Can we discuss whether Array#each is supposed to operate on the receiver atomically or not?

Updated by shioimm (Misaki Shioi) 4 months ago

  • [Feature #20108] Introduction of Happy Eyeballs Version 2 (RFC8305) in Socket.tcp (shioimm)
    • Can this be merged? Or is there something more to consider?

Updated by stuyam (Stuart Yamartino) 4 months ago

  • [Ticket #20080] Introduce #bounds method on Range (stuyam)
    • Easier serialization of ranges, easy array deconstruction for setting begin and end as variable.
Actions #10

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 3 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Status changed from Open to Closed
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0