Misc #20075
closed
Added by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 11 months ago.
Updated 10 months ago.
Description
The next dev meeting¶
Date: 2024/01/17 13:00-17:00 (JST)
Log: https://github.com/ruby/dev-meeting-log/blob/master/2024/DevMeeting-2024-01-17.md
- Dev meeting IS NOT a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
- Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
- Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
- We will write a record of the discussion in the file or to each ticket in English.
- All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
- The date, time and place of the meeting are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.
-
DO NOT discuss then on this ticket, please.
Call for agenda items¶
If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format:
* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
* Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.)
Example:
* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
* I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature.
- It is recommended to add a comment by 2024/01/14. We hold a preparatory meeting to create an agenda a few days before the dev-meeting.
- The format is strict. We'll use this script to automatically create an markdown-style agenda. We may ignore a comment that does not follow the format.
- Your comment is mandatory. We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time. We appreciate it if you could write a short summary and update from a previous discussion.
Related issues
1 (1 open — 0 closed)
- [Feature #20102] Introduce
Fiber#resuming?
- [Feature #19057] Hide implementation of
rb_io_t
.
- Eric has agreed to release updated gems. Can we continue to move forward?
- [Bug #19857] Eval coverage is reset after each
eval
.
- Can we merge proposed fix?
- [Feature #19742] Introduce
Module#anonymous?
- Can we accept definition "Anonymous module is one that does not have a permanent name"?
- Can we introduce this interface?
- [Feature #18035] Introduce general model/semantic for immutability.
- Do we accept proposed syntax.
- Do we accept proposed list of immutable classes?
- [Feature #16495] Inconsistent quotes in error messages
- Gathered feedback from major players in the industry. Is it sufficient to move forward?
- [Feature #13383] Module#source_location
- Matz asked for specific use cases, so here are some:
-
Debugging/Code Discovery: Similar to Method#source_location
, it would be
useful to know where a module/class was defined (especially in large
codebases).
Doing a global search for module Foo
is not always helpful because
nesting might make it harder to find the right one. It can also come from
a Gem.
This can help navigating new codebases much easier/faster.
-
Documentation: It would be useful to know where a module/class was defined
when reading the documentation. RDoc could use this to list all the places
where a module/class was defined.
- I think we should list all the locations, so it should be
Module#source_locations
- [Feature #20066] Reduce Implicit Array/Hash Allocations For Method Calls Involving Splats (jeremyevans0)
- This is a collection of 5 optimizations, some of which are independent.
- The 4th and 5th allow for a performance optimization not currently possible, when using anonymous splats or
...
argument forwarding instead of named splat forwarding.
- I expect these optimizations to have the most impact, after code is updated to switch to anonymous splats or
...
forwarding.
- Currently, the patch slows down yjit-bench with YJIT, because YJIT does not implement the new instructions, or contain the same optimizations.
- I expect yjit-bench with YJIT will speed up if YJIT implements the same optimizations.
- Is it OK to merge the pull request as-is, or to merge a subset of the optimization patches?
- [Bug #5179] Complex#rationalize and to_r with approximate zeros (jeremyevans0)
- Discussed last at the January 2020 developer meeting (as part of #5321).
- Considering we have Float#to_r, can we change
Complex(1, 0.0).to_r
to return Rational(1,1)
, as Complex(1, 0.0.to_r).to_r
does?
- [Bug #19918] Should
a[&b]=c
be syntax valid? (jeremyevans0)
- This is currently valid syntax, and there are tests for it.
- Should we change this to invalid syntax?
- If we keep this syntax:
- It currently evaluates
c
before b
.
- Should it be fixed to evaluate
b
before c
?
- [Bug #19542] Operations on zero-sized IO::Buffer are raising (jeremyevans0)
- Is this behavior expected or a bug?
- [Feature #20093] Syntax or keyword to reopen existing classes/modules, never to define new classes/modules
- To make monkey-patching code more explicitly
- [Feature #18576] Rename
ASCII-8BIT
encoding to BINARY
(eregon)
- Can we experiment for 3.4 by making ASCII-8BIT the alias? If we have pushback based on actual code then let's go more conservative, but otherwise I think we should do the clean/consistent fix here.
- [Feature #20182] Rewrite Array#each in Ruby (k0kubun)
- Can we discuss whether
Array#each
is supposed to operate on the receiver atomically or not?
- [Feature #20108] Introduction of Happy Eyeballs Version 2 (RFC8305) in Socket.tcp (shioimm)
- Can this be merged? Or is there something more to consider?
- [Ticket #20080] Introduce #bounds method on Range (stuyam)
- Easier serialization of ranges, easy array deconstruction for setting
begin
and end
as variable.
- Description updated (diff)
- Status changed from Open to Closed
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Like0
Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0Like0