Future of RubyVM::AST?
Hi! Thanks for all your great work on the Ruby language.
I saw the new RubyVM::AST module in 2.6.0-preview2 and I quickly went to try it out.
I'd love to have a well-documented, user-friendly way to parse and manipulate Ruby code using the Ruby standard library, so I'm pretty excited to try it out. (I've been trying to learn Ripper recently, too: https://ripper-preview.herokuapp.com/, https://rmosolgo.github.io/ripper_events/ .)
Based on my exploration, I opened a small PR on GitHub with some documentation: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/1888
I'm curious though, are there future plans for this module? For example, we might:
- Add more details about each node (for example, we could expose the names of identifiers and operators through the node classes)
- Document each node type
I see there is a lot more information in the C structures that we could expose, and I'm interested to help out if it's valuable. What do you think?
#1 [ruby-core:87481] Updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler) 11 days ago
Just two short comments from me, so that I do not expand the issue request/question
(1) I would like to suggest to you to consider adding your question to the upcoming
developer meeting; it may be best to have the core team and other core contributors
comment on it, including matz and (based on RubyVM I think) koichi.
The next upcoming meeting agenda should be compiled here:
But again, this is just a suggestion from me - it is your issue/question so of
course you should decide. :)
(2) The other thing is, and I may be wrong, but I think there have been quite
a few introspection-related extensions to ruby in general, by different ruby
hackers/developers/core contributors. You mentioned RubyVM but I think there
are a few more examples; Martin in regards to unicode and ... I think the
regex engine (I forgot the particular issue but I remember it was somehow
related to being able to tweak more within the regex engine). MJIT is also
a bit related to more introspection, at the least indirectly, if we can
control how much we can optimize where and how, at the least in the future
(say, past ruby 3.0). matz mentioned one requirement/goal for mruby is in
regards to systems that are constrained, but with MJIT we may be able to
perhaps control more optimizations when it comes to systems that have
more RAM/cpu power/cores and so forth. So, I may be wrong, but I think
several changes in ruby are to some extent related to more introspection.
(The MJIT author blogged about this too, I think ... something about
inline-C or like that? I forgot the details right now, sorry.)
Of course it may be best to have koichi comment on relevant parts
of your question such as "a lot more information in the C structures
that we could expose" (and whether matz is fine with this; I think
matz is fine with it but it may be best to ask this in regards to
the developer meeting altogether).
I personally love introspection.
PS: Actually, I just remembered one more change that is a bit
related to introspection, at
added Binding#source_location. [Feature #14230]
While eval() could be used, I think Binding#source_location
has a nicer API.