Dev meeting IS NOT a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
We will write a record of the discussion in the file or to each ticket in English.
All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
The date, time and place of the meeting are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.
If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format:
* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
* Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.)
Example:
* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
* I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature.
It is recommended to add a comment by 2023/05/07. We hold a preparatory meeting to create an agenda a few days before the dev-meeting.
Your comment is mandatory. We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time. We appreciate it if you could write a short summary and update from a previous discussion.
[Misc #19608] Being a co-maintainer of the ruby/openssl for the OpenSSL FIPS mode
I'm +1 to this proposal. Does anyone have objection?
Thanks for adding the agenda! Note I opened the issue ticket. And I plan to attend this meeting to explain the topic's context in a later timing of the meeting, as I live in a different time zone, Czech Republic.
[Feature #19633] Allow passing block to Kernel#autoload as alternative to second filename argument`
Something like this would remove the need for Zeitwerk to monkeypatch Kernel#require
Connects autoloads directly to any callbacks on them, rather than having the connection be implicit via require. I think this is an improvement.
I am implementing autoloads on anonymous modules via a similar monkeypatch; this would make that monkeypatch unnecessary and simplify other logic via the block's closure.