Project

General

Profile

Misc #15462

DevelopersMeeting20190110Japan

Added by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 11 months ago. Updated 10 months ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
[ruby-core:90707]

Description

Please comment your favorite ticket numbers you want to ask to discuss with your SHORT comment or summary.
(your summary/comment will help us because we don't need to read all of ticket comments)

DO NOT discuss then on this ticket, please.


Date: 2019/01/10 (Thu)
Time: 13:00-17:00 (JST)
Place: Cookpad Inc. (Tokyo, Japan)
Sign-up: https://ruby.connpass.com/event/113278
log: https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1W_wrFsFxxU1MepA6HBpfl-9h-nLD8EBsgMsS7yTDvHE/pub
logedit: https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1W_wrFsFxxU1MepA6HBpfl-9h-nLD8EBsgMsS7yTDvHE/edit

NOTES

  • Dev meeting IS NOT a decision making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker.
  • Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly.
  • Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue).
  • We will write a log about discussion to a file or to each ticket in English.
  • All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
  • The date, time and place is scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.

Agenda

Next dev-meeting

About 2.7 timeframe

Check security tickets

Carry-over from previous meeting(s)

From Attendees

From non-attendees


Please comment your favorite ticket we need to discuss with the following format.

* [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name)
  * your comment why you want to put this ticket here if you want to add.

Your comment is very important if you are no attendee because we can not ask why you want to discuss about it.

Example:

* [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1)
  * I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss about this feature.

I don't guarantee to put tickets in agenda if the comment violate the format (because it is hard to copy&paste).


Files

Screenshot from 2019-01-19 09-17-17.png (71.9 KB) Screenshot from 2019-01-19 09-17-17.png shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe), 01/19/2019 12:28 AM

Related issues

Related to Ruby master - Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeetingOpenActions

History

#1

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 11 months ago

  • Related to Misc #14770: [META] DevelopersMeeting added
#2

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 11 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 11 months ago

  • [Bug #15404] Endless range has inconsistent chaining behaviour
    • Can we prohibit (1.. ..1) and (1..1)..1 as a SyntaxError?

Updated by aycabta (aycabta .) 11 months ago

  • [Feature #14799] Startless range

Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) 11 months ago

  • [Bug #15460] Behaviour of String#setbyte changed
    • What is the expected / desired way to fix this?

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 11 months ago

  • [Bug #7300] Hash#[] の挙動が 1.9.3 と異なっている
    • I think we can remove the compatibility layer for 1.9: Hash[[nil]] #=> {}

Updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun) 11 months ago

  • [Misc #15347] Require C99
    • Is it okay to require C99 features which work on both VC12 (Visual Studio 2013) and Oracle Developer Studio 12 from Ruby 2.7? https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2064
    • Note: 2 major concerns (mswin, solaris) seem to be solved
      • mswin platform maintainer usa (Usaku NAKAMURA) agreed to require VC12 from Ruby 2.7, which is tested on RubyCI and AppVeyor.
      • On Solaris, we support Oracle Developer Studio 12+ and GCC https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14200#note-5. We're already testing GCC on RubyCI, and planning to include Oracle Developer Studio 12.4 / 12.5 on RubyCI Solaris.

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 11 months ago

  • [Feature #6012] Proc#source_location also return the column
    • Now we can implement the issue.

Updated by aycabta (aycabta .) 11 months ago

  • [Feature #15483] Proc or Method combination with Symbol

Updated by zverok (Victor Shepelev) 11 months ago

Old tickets with no reaction/vague reaction:

  • [Feature #14444] MatchData: alias for #[]
  • [Feature #14784] Comparable#clamp with a range
  • [Feature #14145] Better Method#inspect

New tickets:

  • [Bug #15428] Refactor Proc#>> and #<< (it regards the same problem as #15483 above, but approaches it from a different point of view)
  • [Feature #15485] Refactor String#split
  • [Misc #15486] Default gems README.md
  • [Misc #15487] Clarify default gems maintenance policy

(Sorry for a huge list)

Updated by osyo (manga osyo) 11 months ago

  • [Feature #15373] Proposal: Enable refinements to #method and #instance_method
  • [Feature #15374] Proposal: Enable refinements to #method_missing
  • [Bug #15416] 配列リテラル内の引数を伴う括弧なしのメソッド呼び出しで syntax error

Updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 11 months ago

  • [Bug #15497] Encoding of error messages should not depend on the locale encoding (eregon)
    • The behavior is unintuitive and makes it hard to test exception messages.
  • [Bug #2250] IO::for_fd() objects' finalization dangerously closes underlying fds (eregon)
    • The current behavior is dangerous and has caused many spurious test/spec failures which are hard to find and debug. I plan to submit a patch, but I'd like opinions regarding compatibility.

Updated by osyo (manga osyo) 11 months ago

  • [Bug #15488] const_defined?("File::NULL") の挙動
    • What is the expected behavior?

Updated by mrkn (Kenta Murata) 11 months ago

  • [Feature #15445] Reject '.123' in Float() method
    • I want to know Matz's opinion.

Updated by mrkn (Kenta Murata) 11 months ago

  • [Bug #15500] Behavior of require method in 2.5 is different from 2.4 and 2.6
    • Is this bug or not?

Updated by alanwu (Alan Wu) 11 months ago

  • [Feature #15456] Adopt some kind of consistent versioning mechanism
    • More uniformity within the ecosystem would be nice.

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 11 months ago

  • [Feature #11473] Immutable String literal in Ruby 3
    • As I recall, matz said that this has been cancelled at the old developers' meeting. I'd like to confirm.

Updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh) 11 months ago

  • [Feature #15477] Proc#arity returns -1 for composed lambda Procs of known arguments
    • May I commit?

Updated by palkan (Vladimir Dementyev) 11 months ago

  • [Feature #14344] refine at class level
    • there are some proposals for shorter refinements syntax; want to hear commiters opinions (which one is better and good to be implemented)

Updated by duerst (Martin Dürst) 10 months ago

On 2019/01/11 06:53, dementiev.vm@gmail.com wrote:

Issue #15462 has been updated by palkan (Vladimir Dementyev).

  • [Feature #14344] refine at class level
    • there are some proposals for shorter refinements syntax; want to hear commiters opinions (which one is better and good to be implemented)

You posted this at Japan time January 11, 6:53am. Please note that the
meeting is in Japan and therefore on Japan time, which is 9 hours ahead
of UTC. So if you want to raise an issue for this meeting, please make
sure to do it one day in advance in your time zone.

Regards, Martin.

Updated by shevegen (Robert A. Heiler) 10 months ago

Could someone add a date + issue for the next developer meeting, please?

I looked at https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-trunk/issues for when the next
meeting may be, but was unable to find it (assumingly so it may be in February 2019
but of course I do not know matz' schedule).

Thanks.

Updated by shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe) 10 months ago

shevegen (Robert A. Heiler) Here you are https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15546

Off topic: can someone give me the grant to copy issues around? It seems disabled for this account.

Updated by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA) 10 months ago

Off topic: can someone give me the grant to copy issues around? It seems disabled for this account.

Enabled it to Developer role now.

Also available in: Atom PDF